a5c7b9f00b In the not too distant future, Britain is filled with torture cells, unfair punishments, prejudice against minorities. However in the midst of all this chaos, one man known only by the name V dares to stand up to the government and is labeleda terrorist. One night V rescues a mild young woman called Evey Hammond and an unlikely bond between the two emerges which results with Evey becoming Vs ally. But though V may be charismatic and have a passion for justice he also is bitter and has his own personal hatred of the government for something they did to him long ago. As November the 5th, the day V says he and those who will follow him will stand up to the government once and for all approaches, Detective Finch becomes more and more determined to uncover the truth about V, however his search leads him to ask to question whether or not he is on the right side.
Set against the futuristic landscape of totalitarian Britain, V For Vendetta tells the story of a mild-mannered young woman named Evey who is rescued from a life-and-death situation by a masked vigilante known only"V." Incomparably charismatic and ferociously skilled in the art of combat and deception, V ignites a revolution when he detonates two London landmarks and takes over the government-controlled airwaves, urging his fellow citizens to rise up against tyranny and oppression. As Evey uncovers the truth about V's mysterious background, she also discovers the truth about herself - and emergeshis unlikely ally in the culmination of his plot to bring freedom and justice back to a society fraught with cruelty and corruption.
Natalie Portman; Hugo Weaving; The Wachowski Bros., Owen Patterson. The crew is almost the same of Matrix, so there were two actual possibilities: a) this movie could be a special-effect whipped 'thing', of which I could get bored after 15 minutes; b) a masterpiece. Good Luck, we're in the second case!!! Now, I've seen a lot of movies about heroes, and beautiful and fragile girls, but this one . . . Hugo Weaving, 'V' for friends, made this incredible performance with the mask on for the whole film! Kinda makes you wander 'And what if he didn't use it? Would he have been nominated for the 2007 Academy Awards? 'V' is this almost-19th-century hero, actually living in the 21st century, and he's fighting against the system (against the London then-dictator; we're around 2030). He meets this girl,Evey, saving her from a potential multiple rape (transforming it into a multiple murder via stab wounds), and he also falls in love with her. On the other hand, Evey, which isn't pretty much interested in someone who kills people with the smile on the face (litterally), bit by bit gets rid of her fears and, at the very end, she falls in love for V-guy. All this stuff is merged with a certain dark-cyberpunk atmosphere, but less technological than 'Matrix', so that you can feel all the poetry of the main character . . . between a stab and a kick, of course!!<br/><br/>Why I gave it a 9/10: Visually speaking, it's astounding. The interpretation is actually perfect, and the characters seem really to be stitched on the actors; both the main guys, and the 'sidekicks'. The story is a mix of love, drama, thriller, everything merged in a dark atmosphere of a really doomed London. Advice: Vendetta,a lot of people know, is an Italian word to say 'revenge'. Well, I'm Italian, and by seeing this film I've realized the ultimate meaning of the word 'Vendetta'. It could seem ridiculous for you, but, every great scene involving V doing something astounding, I used to say the word (in a low voice, of course!), 'Vendetta' . . . <br/><br/>Why I didn't give it a 10/10: Soundtrack. I don't want to sound or seem the Hermione Granger of cinema, but it's REALLY (sorry for the caps) way too similar to the 'Matrix' one . . .
I read about the comic a long time before I saw the film, and I was intrigued about how it would be handled on celluloid. England is run by a totalitarian regime some time in the future, the leader of the regime is played by John Hurt, who, fittingly played the role of Winston Smith in Michael Radford's version of 1984. The author of the graphic novels the film is based on apparently walked out of the premiere of the movie, and I can see why. The director of V for Vendetta obviously has a great love of the comic, because he does try to deal with the issues that are raised in the comic, but his ineptnessa director lets the comic down, badly. Among the issues, are how fear (caused by terrorism) can allow the public to be manipulated by politicians who then push through draconian laws which they claim to be for the good of the people but are actually covering darker ulterior motives. The editing is cringingly bad, it really makes you wonder if there was a director behind the production at all, the leads (Natalie Portman and Hugo Weaving) rush their way through a script that clunks and grinds along for most of the movie. The 'relationship' between Portman's and Weaving's characters is totally implausible because there is not even a hint of a gradual development of Portman's trust in 'V', who is, after all quite a dubious character given that he wears a mask the whole time. That you're expected to believe in The dodgy London English accents (I should know, since I am a born and bred Londoner) add's to the farcical catalogue of other things that make this a bad film. I actually got quite angry about this one, because the subject matter is topical and raises a lot of questions, but it could have been handled so much better by a more accomplished director.
It's a terrific movie. I love the look and the verve of the thing, the confidence of its epic design, its smart use of half a dozen noted British thesps, lending weight and wit to the supporting roles.
However, if you listen to the coroner's exact words, there is a suggestion of superpowers having developed: "The mutations seem to have triggered the abnormal development of basic kinesthesia and reflexes." It's possible that The Wachowski brothers misunderstood, or decided to expand, the definition of kinesthesia, which is in fact that sense that allows us to determine the physical positions of our extremities in relation to ourselves. For example, it allows us to touch our nose with our eyes closed. In the case of V, we are perhaps expected to believe that he was able to comprehend his position, and the position of other objects, in the physical universe with greater speed and claity than an average human. This, combined with his increased strength, does suggest he was a form of superhero.<br/><br/>In the graphic novel, no such mention of "increased abilities" is made, nor are we given any reason to believe that he acts with any abnormal capability. He is not presenteda "superhero" in the classic, "spandex-clad-with-no-visible-means-of-support" sense. In the source material, V is described"a psychopath… in its most precise sense." The experimentation at Larkhill had no physical effect on him, but rather altered his perception of the world and how he occupied it. It essentially removed the subconscious censor that we all have between thought and action. Our minds/bodies work on a sequence of perception-evaluation-planning-conscience-reaction (we see a threat, we take a moment to work out how dangerous it is, then how to counter it, then we have a moment's doubt, and then we defend/attack/flee/hide). V has lost the middle steps of the sequence anda result, his body reacts instantly and instinctively, doing exactly what he needs to in order to counter any threat without conscience. To "normal" people, the ability to act without fear of the consequence may seem inhuman—but not superhuman.<br/><br/>There are some elements that might be seensupernatural, although the surface asserts a purely natural narrative; the inexplicable appearance in the swept and secure Victoria Station is one. Sending out hundreds of thousands of tight fitting costumes and tall boots, all of which appear to fit the wearers, might be another. Most of all, the image with the dominoes, intercut with Finch's psychic perception of the pattern, suggests at least a supernatural relationship to causality. They are Creedy's special police force. They do the black-bagging and interrogations,wellhaving the authority to make on-the-spot judgements for offenders, without due process of law. Finch is the leader of the Nose, which is essentially the regular police force—they sniff out criminals. Sutler might be considered the Brain. The Fingers do the dirty work. The Eyes and Ears are visual and auditory surveillance (led by Heyer and Etheridge respectively). The Mouth is the news outlets, the propaganda machine (led by Dascomb). Together they make up the Head and the five senses, though only the term "Fingermen" survived the novel's translation to film, with the Nose, Mouth, etc left unmentioned by those names. In the film, breaking curfew is a crime for which Fingermen (the secret police) get judicial discretion on dealing with suspects (in effect, actingjudge and jury, meting out punishment themselves). The men Evey runs into in the film were planning to use this discretion to rape her with a legal seal of approval. Part of their mentality is that of seeing curfew policiesexisting to protect against such things, and they will go out of their way to ensure that such things occur when curfew is broken (which the media outlets can then spin with expressions like "See what happens when you break curfew?"). In the graphic novel, the charge is prostitution and the Fingermen clearly state they are going to rape and kill Evey. The Old Bailey is the Central Criminal Crown Court in Central London, and yes, it is actually known today"The Old Bailey", although, officially, "The Old Bailey" is the name of the road on which the Court is located. This has not been revealed, but many believe ultimately it doesn't matter, believing that their purpose was never to kill/hurt people. Instead, they were to be a tool to scare/force people at the station to allow V access to the airways, and then later, to keep them busy while he made his escape. However, if they were real, Dascomb's ability to disarm them was due to either: (1) The bomb's set up wasn't so intricate that there was a right and wrong wire to be cut. If any part of the setup was disconnected, the whole thing wouldn't work. (2) He has prior experience in working with explosives, perhapspart of military service or employment by the police. (3) He simply got lucky and guessed the correct wire. If they weren't real, then it didn't matter what he did, or did not do,nothing would have happened either way.<br/><br/>Common arguments for them being real: (1) Killing well-known news anchors,welldestroying their main news studio, would have stirred up more emotion amongst the government and populace than the deaths of people they've never heard of, or buildings no one cares about. (2) V knows thatsoonpossible after his message is broadcast, the BTN will surely play some sort of message against it, either the disheartening "terrorist captured and killed" response we saw, or something similar. By destroying the country's main news studio,wellits top anchors immediately afterwards, it delays the time the BTN is able to broadcast a response, giving the populace who saw it more time to think it over and inevitably discuss it amongst themselves. The BTN's response will also be less believable due to the delay and in hearing it from lesser or completely unknown anchors. (3) Any single terrorist act, especially subsequent attacks (remember the first attack being the destruction of the Old Bailey) will always cause an erosion, at least temporarily, in popular support for a government.<br/><br/>Common arguments for them not being real: (1) If they had gone off, V could have been close enough to have been killed/injured in the explosion. (2) An explosive of that size would not have been great enough to cause significant damage to the building and/or BTN's propaganda apparatus. Consider that even if the explosion had destroyed the studio and a good part of the surrounding floor, surely BTN has other studios available, at other locations, which could broadcast whatever they want in a matter of minutes. (3) V displays a tendency to not kill without specific reason. Therefore, it isn't likely that he would blow up a room full of civilians who hadn't harmed him personally. However, a good counterargument to this third point is that V's Domino Plan involves inspiring violent anarchy in the UK. This will result in civilian deaths/casualtiesNorsefire will undoubtedly commit even further outrage-inspiring atrocities in an attempt to restore order. Also, V clearly does not have any problem killing Fingermen and police officers who work for the state. As such, office personnel at the BTN could easily be considered among those working for the state, and therefore part of the problem. It is Latin for, "By the power of truth, I, while living, have conquered the universe." Although V attributes the phrase to Faust both in the graphic novel and the
A Simple Twist of Fate full movie hd 720p free downloadEpisode 1.227 hd full movie downloadChinatown Murder Mystery: The Case of the Poisoned Hand full movie in hindi free downloadEpisode 2.24 full movie 720p downloadhindi RollerballBatman Begins movie in hindi dubbed downloadBoot Camp or Bust malayalam full movie free downloadthe I See You full movie download in hindiTimeline movie download in mp4tamil movie dubbed in hindi free download Winner Takes All